         
|
June
16, 2004 Meeting Minutes
| |
MINUTES |
| |
DRYCLEANER
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TRUST FUND
COUNCIL of ILLINOIS
HOLIDAY
INN SELECT
NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS
JUNE 16,
2004
|
|
John
Polak, Chairperson, called the Drycleaner Environmental Response
Trust Fund Council of Illinois meeting to order at 10:04 a.m. A
quorum was present. Roll call was taken with the following members
present: |
|
John Bredenkamp
Augustine Chung (via telephonic conference)
Andrew Chweh
David Gibson (joined the meeting via telephonic conference at
10:09 a.m.)
Young B. Kim
Jerry Lewicki
John Polak
Also present
were:
H. Patrick Eriksen, Program Administrator's Office
John McCarthy, Program Counsel
C. Michael Perkins, Program Administrator's Office
Juho So, Program Administrator's Office
|
|
PRELIMINARY
BUSINESS |
|
The minutes
from the May 6, 2004 Council meeting were reviewed. On a motion
by Mr. Bredenkamp and a second by Mr. Lewicki, the minutes were
approved by a vote of 6-0.
|
| |
APPEAL
OF DENIAL OF REMEDIAL/INSURANCE CLAIM BENEFITS |
| |
Site #0001517
- Scott One Hour Cleaners, 49 Green Bay Rd, Winnetka, IL
Mr. Eriksen reviewed with the Council his memorandum included
in the Council packet, outlining background information and a
chronological listing of events surrounding the application for
clean-up benefits from the Fund and the Administrator's subsequent
denial of those benefits.
Mr. Gibson
joined the meeting at 10:09 a.m.
Mr. John Brom,
attorney for Mr. Hanus, trustee for the real estate owner and
a listed additional insured on the policy, addressed the Council.
His presentation focused on his belief that his client was eligible
for both remedial benefits as the owner of an inactive drycleaning
facility, and insurance benefits as a named additional insured
on the environmental pollution liability policy issued by the
Fund. Mr. Brom noted that there was contamination discovered at
the facility but it was not known when the release occurred at
the facility. He indicated that his research determined that the
onus of determining when the release occurred was the responsibility
of the insurer and not of the insured. Mr. Polak reminded Mr.
Brom that the Fund was not an insurance company. Mr. Brom responded
that although he was aware of that, his comments were based on
common law not state insurance regulations or insurance law.
Mr. Kenneth
Anspach, representing drycleaner owner/operator claimant Mr. N.S.
Han, addressed the Council. His presentation focused on the insurance
policy and that the Council had the duty to defend the insured
against a claim (which he represented was the lawsuit initiated
by Mr. Brom's client against Mr. Han) and that the burden of proof
on determining when the release occurred was on the Fund and not
on his client. Mr. Anspach admitted that he was not certain if
his client was entitled to remedial benefits but he felt he was
definitely entitled to benefits under the insurance policy. He
argued the Administrator erred in providing additional reasons
for denying the claim. Mr. Polak disagreed with his estoppel argument
and noted that both appellants failed to provide 24-hour notice
to the Fund as required under the policy once the contamination
was discovered. Mr. Anspach argued that the notice period was
not significant to the eligibility of the claim and again invoked
violation of the estoppel argument as the Fund did not issue a
reservation of rights letter when the claim for benefits was filed.
Mr. Eriksen replied that the initial claim was assumed to be a
remedial claim based on the information provided by the claimant.
He reminded the Council that Mr. Han had never contacted the Fund
prior to the intrusive testing nor inquired about the Fund's policies
and procedures in applying for benefits. Mr. Eriksen noted that
all insureds at the time they had received their initial insurance
policy received a claim kit from the Fund, which would have provided
guidance to Mr. Han in the event that contamination was discovered
at the drycleaning facility.
After additional
discussion, the Council concurred that they would not make a decision
on this appeal today and remanded the appeal to legal counsel
for additional review of all the information presented at today's
hearing and stated that they would continue discussion of the
issue at a future Council meeting.
|
| |
OPERATIONAL
ISSUES |
| |
A. |
TACO
Presentation by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency: |
| |
|
Mr. Greg Dunn,
of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, made a detailed
presentation to the Council on the framework of the Tiered Approach
to Corrective Action (TACO). The presentation covered misconceptions
about TACO, site investigation objectives, remedial action objectives,
approaches to implementing TACO, as well as a detailed discussion
of exposure pathways and their impact on the application of TACO.
Mr. Polak
thanked Mr. Dunn for an enlightening and informative presentation.
|
|
B.
|
Review of Historic Site Investigation Budget Approvals: |
|
|
Mr. Polak
noted that due to the limited time available to the Council today
that he would like to defer discussion of these statistics until
the strategic planning session next month. The memorandum from
Mr. Perkins and Dr. So indicated that there has been a reduction
of the average cost per facility since the program's inception.
The Council
recessed at 11:38 a.m. and reconvened at 11:43 a.m.
|
| |
C. |
Update on Administrative Rules: |
| |
|
Mr. Eriksen
reviewed with the Council that JCAR had formally objected to the
Council implementing the changes to the license fee and solvent
taxes prior to incorporating the changes in administrative rules.
As he had individually discussed with each of the Council members,
this objection was filed with the Council less than 24 hours prior
to the initial rules hearing on May 18, 2004. JCAR indicated their
primary concern is that the general public did not have sufficient
notice and awareness of the proposed fees and taxes changes.
JCAR filed
a recommendation regarding the calculation of solvent usage for
determining the annual licensing fees, stating the Council should
seek legislative authority to use solvent purchases for calculating
the annual license fee in the event annual usage cannot readily
be determined.
Mr. Eriksen
attended the JCAR meeting on June 15, 2004 and was allowed the
opportunity to address JCAR and outline in detail the actions
the Council had taken in regards to public hearings, notifications,
etc., prior to changing the licensing fees and solvent taxes.
In addition, he noted that only one (1) comment had been received
during the JCAR public hearing period, and that was from a drycleaner
who had already commented directly to the Council on the proposed
changes. JCAR acknowledged the efforts made by the Council but
voted to file notice that the Council failed to remedy JCAR's
Notice of Objection.
Mr. Eriksen
reported that JCAR has given approval for the Council to adopt
and file with the Secretary of State, the adopted rule amendments
as soon as possible.
The Council
reviewed the changes proposed by JCAR. Most of those were corrections
of terminology that would create conflict within the rules and
the definition of Council approved criteria for waiving the licensing
late payment fees.
After brief
discussion by the Council, on a motion by Mr. Bredenkamp and a
second by Mr. Lewicki, the Council approved the amended rules
by a vote of 7-0 and directed the Administrator to file them with
the Secretary of State.
Mr. Chung
left the meeting.
|
| |
D. |
Legal Representation: |
| |
|
Mr. Eriksen
reported that Mr. McCarthy's fiscal year 2004 contract with the
Council for the provision of legal services expires June 30, 2004.
The contract is for an amount not to exceed $20,000 and to date
the Council has paid Mr. McCarthy $14,069.48.
He noted that
Mr. McCarthy's knowledge of the Fund and legal expertise have
been beneficial to the program and it is the Administrator's recommendation
that the Council enter into a contract with Mr. McCarthy to continue
providing legal services to the Council for fiscal year 2005,
for a cost not to exceed $20,000. Mr. McCarthy currently charges
the Fund $135 per hour for professional services and $80 per hour
for travel time and these hourly rates would remain the same for
fiscal year 2005.
Dr. Chweh
asked if the Council is required to obtain public bids for these
legal services. Mr. Eriksen replied no, as this is a professional
and artistic contract and contracts in the amount of $20,000 or
less do not have to be publicly bid per the State's purchasing
regulations.
On a motion
by Mr. Lewicki and a second by Mr. Bredenkamp, the Council approved
by a vote of 6-0, entering into a contract with Mr. McCarthy for
fiscal year 2005 for an amount not to exceed $20,000. The hourly
rates would remain unchanged.
|
| |
E. |
Review of Compliance Program Continuing Education Courses: |
| |
|
Mr. Eriksen
noted that there were two (2) continuing education issues for
review by the Council. He commented that the Council had previously
designated the Administrator to do the initial review and certification
of continuing education credits for Council approved compliance
programs based on the criteria outlined in the Council's revised
compliance guidance document (February 3, 2004). He noted that
in the event the continuing education course sponsor/presenter
disagreed with the Administrator's determination of eligibility
or the number of hours of continuing education to be awarded,
the Council would review the information and make a final determination.
Mr. Eriksen
stated the first course for review was one presented by Mr. George
Vaselakos on April 1, 2004 to the Chicagoland Cleaners Association.
The focus of his presentation was on OSHA compliance and recordkeeping.
He noted Mr. Vaselakos indicated that his presentation included
Power Point presentations covering respirators, chemical handling
and the environmental impact complacency can have when handling
chemicals. Mr. Eriksen stated that the Administrator is asking
for Council review and determination if a CEU credit should be
given for this course in as much as the Administrator did not
receive the required course material, biography on the presenter,
etc., prior to the April 1, 2004 meeting. Mr. Vaselakos verbally
represented to the Administrator that he had mailed the information
prior to the April 1st meeting. He subsequently emailed the necessary
information on May 2nd.
Mr. Bredenkamp
indicated that he felt that the Council had established requirements
and that to waive the requirements would set a bad precedence
for the future. Mr. Vaselakos addressed the Council stating that
the Administrator should have sent a letter acknowledging the
receipt of the material. Mr. Bredenkamp replied that that was
not possible as the Administrator did not receive the material.
Mr. Henry Parker of S&ECC indicated that Mr. Vaselakos had filled
in on his behalf as he had initially been asked to do the presentation
but had an out-of-town commitment that could not be rescheduled.
Mr. Parker questioned if Mr. Vaselakos had the appropriate credentials
to speak on OSHA and Fund issues. Mr. Vaselakos rebutted that
he was qualified as he had attended OSHA training and had advanced
degrees in biochemical engineering. Mr. Polak noted there were
two (2) issues raised and the primary issue is the timely filing
of the required information with the Administrator and the second
is regarding whether the course instructor met the Council's criteria.
Mr. Parker noted that he had received comments from six (6) of
the drycleaners that attended and that the presentation had only
lasted 20 minutes, that the video projector was inoperable and
the Power Point presentation was not shown. Mr. Vaselakos acknowledged
that the video projector was inoperable but that the seminar had
lasted for approximately 50 minutes and noted that Mr. Jeff Diver,
who was in attendance at the Council meeting, was also in attendance
at that meeting. Mr. Diver stated that although he could not recall
the exact length of the presentation, the presentation and question
and answer session would have encompassed approximately 50 minutes.
Mr. Bredenkamp
made a motion and Mr. Gibson seconded the motion to deny any CEUs
for this course as the required information was not timely received
prior to the course being offered. On a roll call vote, the motion
passed by a vote of 6-0.
The Council
discussed the request of the Land of Lincoln Drycleaners Association
to receive additional continuing education credit for the watershed
presentation and tour that would be conducted at their June 2004
meeting. Mr. Eriksen noted that he has allowed one (1) hour of
CEU for the presentation to be conducted by Mr. Henry Parker and
Mr. Bob Soni regarding paperwork and program compliance requirements.
The remaining 1 ½ hours of the meeting is to be a presentation
and tour of a watershed project presented by Ms. Emily Kinney.
Mr. Eriksen stated that he had reviewed the content of the watershed
presentation and did not believe it met the compliance program
criteria as defined by the Council in February 2004.
Mr. Ken Sink,
Vice President of Land of Lincoln Drycleaners Association, felt
that the watershed tour was a benefit as it shows drycleaners
what could happen to their groundwater if they do not closely
adhere to compliance program requirements and he referenced the
recent contamination that had been discovered in Downer's Grove.
The Council
discussed the issue in detail. On a motion by Mr. Lewicki and
a second by Mr. Kim, the Council, by a vote of 4-1, approved one-half
(1/2) hour of additional CEU credit for the presentation and tour
of the watershed project by Ms. Kinney.
Dr. Chweh
made a motion to allow 1 ½ hours of CEU for the watershed presentation.
It died for a lack of a second.
|
| |
F. |
Strategic Planning Topics: |
| |
|
Mr. Eriksen
reviewed with the Council the tentative listing of Strategic Planning
topics and asked if they had any additional topics they would
like discussed at the meeting that they provide them to him as
soon as possible.
The Council
reconfirmed that the meeting would be Thursday, July 22, 2004.
Mr. Polak offered the use of his employer's facility in Peoria,
IL for the meeting. It was the concurrence of the Council that
the Strategic Planning meeting would be held at Argonaut Great
Central Insurance Company in Peoria on July 22, 2004.
|
| |
G. |
Legislative Updates: |
| |
|
Mr. Eriksen
updated the Council that since the last Council meeting there
was a new piece of legislation introduced that would have a significant
impact on the Fund. It is HB7181, which was amended by the Senate
on May 31, 2004, and would transfer $5,457,000 from the Illinois
Environmental Response Trust Fund into the State's Budget Stabilization
Fund. This is a fund that the Governor and legislature have used
to improve stability in the General Revenue Fund. The proposed
bill states the money would be transferred as of July 1, 2004
and that if the Fund should have insufficient cash to satisfy
expenditure obligations on a timely basis, funds could be transferred
back to the Drycleaner Trust Fund for the Council's use. Mr. Eriksen
noted that the House has not approved this bill and that there
is still significant disagreement between the Governor, the Senate
and the House on a comprehensive budget bill. Ms. Dorcee Lauen
is in attendance at an Appropriation Hearing that Speaker Madigan
called for today and Thursday. His request is for each agency
to review their budgets and to determine if they could pare back
any funds.
Mr. Eriksen
stated that he would closely monitor this legislation and keep
the Council updated if there are any significant changes.
|
| |
APPROVAL
OF PROGRAM BILLINGS |
| |
Mr.
Eriksen noted that there were two (2) bills requiring Council review
and action. The bills for Council review are as follows: |
| |
1.
Williams & Company Consulting, Inc $
64,295.00
Standard flat fee billing for May 2004, licensing, underwriting,
claims processing and site inspections. |
| |
2.
John J. McCarthy $
1,425.00
Professional legal services to the Council for the period of April
28, 2004 through June 9, 2004. |
| |
On a motion
by Mr. Bredenkamp and a second by Mr. Lewicki, the bills were
approved by a vote of 6-0.
|
|
REVIEW
OF ACTIVITY REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
| |
Mr. Eriksen
reviewed with the Council that currently there are 1,323 licensed
drycleaners. Staff continues to determine the status of the 133
drycleaners that have not renewed their license for 2003. In addition,
he just received word from the Attorney General's Office that
they are willing to send out a letter informing unlicensed participants
that they need to be licensed within a 60-day timeframe or subject
themselves to civil litigation, including the shutdown of their
facilities.
He noted that
there are 898 insurance applications currently in force, with
a number of buyback policies still in the review process waiting
for needed information. Remedial claims total 276, with estimated
reserves of $15.5 million.
The Fund
balance as of May 31, 2004 was $6,305,088. Claim payments to date
total $2 million, with the months of March and April reflecting
almost $400,000 of payments for each of those months.
|
| |
OTHER
ISSUES AS PRESENTED |
| |
Mr. Eriksen
reported that he has been in contact with the Illinois Department
of Revenue and that they should be providing in the near future,
the first quarter solvent numbers. He plans to report to the Council
those numbers at the July 22, 2004 Strategic Planning meeting.
In addition,
he noted that the Council needed to complete their expense reports
as soon as possible as we are coming up on the cutoff for the
fiscal year end payment processing.
|
| |
PUBLIC
COMMENT PERIOD |
| |
Mr. Ken Sink
had several questions regarding the JCAR hearings and the notification
of the hearings. Mr. Eriksen clarified for him that the only parties
who can provide oral comments at JCAR hearings are state agencies
and they only speak when called upon by the committee.
Mr. Parker
addressed the issue of a letter from Mr. Eriksen stating that
all hazardous waste containers must have secondary containment
even if they are not in the general proximity of the drycleaning
machine. Mr. Eriksen reviewed in detail his decision. Mr. Parker
said that he would communicate the Administrator's decision to
his compliance program members.
There being
no further business, on a motion by Mr. Gibson and a second by
Mr. Lewicki, the meeting adjourned at 12:40 p.m. by a vote of
6-0.
|
| |
Back
to Top |
|